Operations and Supply Chain Management OSCM

 View Only

Journal of Supply Chain Management (JSCM) A Special Topic Forum (STF) Dedicated to “Theory Building Surrounding Sustainable Supply Chain Management”

  • 1.  Journal of Supply Chain Management (JSCM) A Special Topic Forum (STF) Dedicated to “Theory Building Surrounding Sustainable Supply Chain Management”

    Posted 03-06-2014 22:49
    Dear Colleagues

    Please refer to e-mail below from Gideon Markman, Associate Professor of
    Strategy, Innovation, & Entrepreneurship, Dept. of Management
    Colorado State University, re subject matter.

    Regards
    Mile'


    Journal of Supply Chain Management (JSCM)

    A Special Topic Forum (STF) Dedicated to “Theory Building Surrounding
    Sustainable Supply Chain Management”

    Guest Editors:
    Gideon Markman, Colorado State University
    Dan Krause, Colorado State University

    The area of social and environmental sustainability attracts scholars from
    diverse disciplines (e.g., supply chain, management, finance, accounting,
    marketing, political science, sociology, economics, management, etc. to
    name a few). Such cross-disciplinary effort is needed because although
    many scholars link sustainability to discrete business activities—inbound
    and outbound logistics, processes and operations, finished products and
    customer interface, distribution channels, and services—we do not have an
    overarching, integrative theory of sustainability.

    For example, some suggest a “green to be seen” perspective—that consumers
    are willing to pay extra for sustainable offerings but only if clear
    status incentives are associated with such purchases (Griskevicius, Tybur,
    & Van den Bergh, 2010). Others note that because a shift towards
    sustainable practices is costly and disruptive of firms’ functions, green
    management matters, but only if it yields higher profits (Siegel, 2009).
    If companies can charge premium prices (and consumers are willing to pay
    more) for sustainable products, but only when such purchases enhance
    buyers’ reputation or firms’ bottom line, what are the implications for
    products, services, and operations that are less observable or less
    augmentative of financial performance? Indeed, some companies, such as
    Apple, decline to name their suppliers and the provenance of raw materials
    (The Guardian, 2013). When companies follow a policy of non-disclosure of
    suppliers, materials, and practices, do they worry that transparency—
    including the touting of ethical supply chain practices—reveals their
    competitive secrets to rivals? Are they simply attempting to hide
    unethical practices? Or, are there other reasons?

    Regardless of the motivation, it is increasingly apparent that choices and
    considerations of sustainability are critical in most if not all business
    functions. Despite the importance of sustainability, not every scholar,
    manager, or company agrees on the conceptual connections among and drivers
    of sustainability and SCM. Part of the problem is insufficient theory.

    Supply chain scholars are perhaps among the most qualified to develop a
    theory of sustainability because they observe firms’ entire value chains.
    Such scholarship analyzes how firms combine raw inputs from disparate
    suppliers; how inputs are processed and augmented into outputs; and how
    such outputs are then sold to customers. This also means that supply
    chain scholars can keenly appreciate how even seemingly inconsequential
    choices in early value-chain activities can trigger cascading effects that
    bring a smooth-running operation to a grinding halt with negative
    consequences—e.g., undermining the reputation of a single firm, or worse,
    ravaging entire industries (e.g., the tobacco industry).

    Such examples, and scores of insightful studies in diverse disciplines,
    corroborate the need—in fact, an opportunity—to develop an overarching,
    integrative theory of sustainability. Hence, this STF is a platform for
    scholars to showcase their best conceptual research on sustainability, and
    hopefully, its impact on operations and supply chain management. The STF
    might appear broad—encompassing sustainability, ethics, CSR, and of
    course, supply chain management—but the focus on theory papers (which
    encompass both pure conceptual theory building and qualitative
    methodologies such as inductive case studies) rather than deductive, big
    data, “empirical” research does narrow the scope.

    We are particularly interested in “edgy” manuscripts that would yield
    conceptual platforms, open up new research frontiers, or offer new
    insights that significantly enrich discussion and discourse as well as
    those that unpack important, timeless, yet revelatory topics. We dare
    contributors to think outside the traditional “research sandbox" and to
    feature radical, controversial, novel, useful, and non-obvious conceptual
    lenses—even if not fully grounded in well-validated empirical studies. Of
    course, manuscripts can't be merely descriptive; a strong effort to build
    a theoretical foundation is still needed. The STF hopes to energize the
    field by featuring contributions that extend existing knowledge, challenge
    research dogmas, cross disciplinary boundaries, and reveal what we
    otherwise had not conceived about sustainability.

    To echo others and apply their logic to the STF, a good theory would offer
    a causal story about the nature of sustainability, as well as on its
    antecedents, drivers, and consequences (Sutton & Staw, 1995). Laced with
    a set of convincing and logically interconnected arguments, a theory of
    sustainability might also burrow into micro-processes, laterally into
    neighboring conceptual arenas (e.g., ethics), or in an upward direction,
    tying itself to broader social or environmental outcomes and events.
    Indeed, a theory of sustainability might have implications that we have
    not seen, including inferences that run counter to prevalent
    expectations. Weick (1995) notes that a good theory explains, predicts,
    and delights; we will be delighted to receive manuscripts that feature a
    theory that explains and predicts social and/or environmental supply chain
    sustainability.

    The STF and review process will favor scholarly work that breaks away
    from “gradualism” in order to shed light on both big conceptual questions
    and on significant and practical problems that are related to the topical
    area. Consistent with the JSCM ethos, the final manuscripts—collectively
    and individually—will have to make strong theoretical contributions.


    SUBMISSION PROCESS AND DEADLINES

    Papers will be reviewed following the JSCM double-blind review process.
    Papers should be submitted between December 15, 2014 and the January 15,
    2015 deadline via the Journal's online submission platform
    (http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/jscm). Please note in the cover letter
    that the submission is for the Special Topic Forum on Theory Building
    Surrounding Sustainable Supply Chain Management. Papers should be
    prepared using the JSCM Guidelines.
    Questions can be addressed to the guest editors:
    Gideon Markman (gideon.markman@colostate.edu)
    Dan Krause (dan.krause@business.colostate.edu).
    The editors welcome informal enquiries related to proposed topics.

    Special Issue Workshop: To help authors advance their manuscripts, a
    Special Issue Workshop will be held in May 2015 in Denver, Colorado (to co-
    occur with the Sustainability, Ethics, and Entrepreneurship—SEE—
    Conference). Authors of R&R manuscripts will be invited to present and
    discuss their papers during the workshop, but presentation at the workshop
    does not guarantee acceptance of papers for publication in JSCM.
    Attending the workshop is not a precondition for acceptance into the STF.

    References:
    Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J.M., & Van den Bergh, B. 2010. Going green to be
    seen: Status, reputation, and conspicuous conservation. Journal of
    Personality and Social Psychology, 98: 392–404.
    Monbiot, G., 2013. Why is Apple so shifty about how it makes the iPhone?
    The Guardian. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/sep/23/apple-
    shifty-about-making-iphone (last accessed - December 25, 2013).
    Siegel, D.S. 2009. Green management matters only if it yields more green:
    An economic/strategic perspective. Academy of Management Perspective,
    23:5-16.

    --
    Gideon D. Markman

    Associate Professor of Strategy, Innovation, & Entrepreneurship
    Dept. of Management
    Colorado State University
    218 Rockwell Hall
    Fort Collins, CO 80523-1275
    USA
    Office: 970.491.7154
    Fax: 970.491.3522
    E-Mail 1: gideon.markman@colostate.edu
    E-Mail 2: gid.markman@gmail.com

    SEE our Conference: http://seeconf.org




    --
    Gideon D. Markman

    Associate Professor of Strategy, Innovation, & Entrepreneurship
    Dept. of Management
    Colorado State University
    218 Rockwell Hall
    Fort Collins, CO 80523-1275
    USA
    Office: 970.491.7154
    Fax: 970.491.3522
    E-Mail 1: gideon.markman@colostate.edu
    E-Mail 2: gid.markman@gmail.com

    SEE our Conference: http://seeconf.org